This Stage used 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese expert system business that establishes open-source large language designs (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and funded by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, developed the company in 2023 and functions as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 design provides responses similar to other modern large language models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a substantially lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and needs a tenth of the computing power of a comparable LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI models were established amid United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were planned to limit the ability of these 2 nations to establish innovative AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek launched its first totally free chatbot app, based on the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had exceeded ChatGPT as the most-downloaded complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] causing Nvidia’s share rate to drop by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success against bigger and more established competitors has actually been referred to as “upending AI”, [8] constituting “the first shot at what is becoming an international AI space race”, [11] and introducing “a brand-new era of AI brinkmanship”. [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative expert system algorithms, models, and training information open-source, enabling its code to be freely readily available for usage, modification, watching, and creating files for building purposes. [13] The company apparently intensely recruits young AI researchers from leading Chinese universities, [8] and hires from outside the computer technology field to diversify its designs’ knowledge and capabilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI enthusiast Liang Wenfeng, who had actually been trading given that the 2007-2008 financial crisis while going to Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he established High-Flyer as a hedge fund focused on establishing and utilizing AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer solely used AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has actually made its generative synthetic intelligence chatbot open source, meaning its code is freely readily available for use, adjustment, and viewing. This consists of consent to access and utilize the source code, as well as design files, for developing purposes. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had constructed up a shop of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are utilized to train AI [16], before the United States federal government imposed AI chip constraints on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer began an artificial general intelligence laboratory dedicated to research study establishing AI tools different from High-Flyer’s financial business. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the investors, the lab became its own company, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Venture capital firms were unwilling in offering funding as it was not likely that it would have the ability to generate an exit in a short duration of time. [15]

After launching DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which used strong performance for a low rate, DeepSeek became called the driver for China’s AI model cost war. It was rapidly called the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other significant tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba began to cut the price of their AI models to complete with the company. Despite the low cost charged by DeepSeek, it paid compared to its competitors that were losing money. [20]

DeepSeek is concentrated on research study and has no in-depth prepare for commercialization; [20] this likewise allows its innovation to avoid the most stringent arrangements of China’s AI policies, such as requiring consumer-facing technology to comply with the government’s controls on details. [3]

DeepSeek’s working with preferences target technical capabilities instead of work experience, resulting in many new hires being either recent university graduates or designers whose AI careers are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the company recruits people with no computer system science background to assist its technology understand other subjects and knowledge areas, including having the ability to create poetry and perform well on the infamously challenging Chinese college admissions exams (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek released its very first series of design, DeepSeek-Coder, which is offered totally free to both researchers and business users. The code for the model was made open-source under the MIT license, with an additional license contract (“DeepSeek license”) relating to “open and accountable downstream usage” for the design itself. [21]

They are of the same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed listed below. The series consists of 8 models, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base designs.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of guideline information. This produced the Instruct models.

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, connected by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek launched the DeepSeek-LLM series of models, with 7B and 67B specifications in both Base and Chat kinds (no Instruct was released). It was established to contend with other LLMs readily available at the time. The paper claimed benchmark results higher than many open source LLMs at the time, especially Llama 2. [26]: section 5 Like Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the design itself. [27]

The architecture was basically the very same as those of the Llama series. They utilized the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text gotten by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat versions of the two Base models was also released concurrently, acquired by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they released 2 DeepSeek-MoE models (Base, Chat), each of 16B criteria (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was basically the very same as DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They declared equivalent efficiency with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variant of the standard sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared experts” that are constantly queried, and “routed specialists” that may not be. They found this to assist with professional balancing. In standard MoE, some experts can end up being overly relied on, while other specialists might be rarely utilized, losing parameters. Attempting to balance the specialists so that they are similarly utilized then causes experts to reproduce the exact same capacity. They proposed the shared specialists to find out core capabilities that are often used, and let the routed experts to learn the peripheral capabilities that are hardly ever used. [28]

In April 2024, they launched 3 DeepSeek-Math designs specialized for doing math: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a previously pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base design.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K mathematics issues and their tool-use-integrated step-by-step options. This produced the Instruct model.
Reinforcement knowing (RL): The benefit model was a procedure reward model (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd technique. [30] This benefit model was then utilized to train Instruct using group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics questions “associated to GSM8K and MATH”. The reward model was continuously updated throughout training to avoid reward hacking. This led to the RL model.

V2

In May 2024, they released the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 designs, 2 base models (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The 2 bigger models were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K using YaRN. [32] This led to DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M circumstances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for security. This resulted in DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not launched.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in two stages. The very first phase was trained to fix mathematics and coding problems. This stage utilized 1 benefit model, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for math). The second phase was trained to be handy, safe, and follow guidelines. This phase utilized 3 reward models. The helpfulness and safety reward models were trained on human choice information. The rule-based reward design was by hand set. All trained reward designs were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This led to the launched variation of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They chose 2-staged RL, due to the fact that they discovered that RL on reasoning data had “special attributes” different from RL on basic data. For example, RL on thinking could improve over more training actions. [31]

The 2 V2-Lite designs were smaller sized, and qualified similarly, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat only underwent SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to help “further research study and advancement on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]

Architecturally, the V2 models were substantially customized from the DeepSeek LLM series. They changed the basic attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head hidden attention (MLA), and used the mixture of specialists (MoE) alternative formerly released in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was cheaper than its peers with a rate of 2 RMB for every single million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they launched 4 models in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base designs were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the version at the end of pretraining), then pretrained further for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base designs.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were used to produce 20K code-related and 30K math-related direction data, then integrated with a guideline dataset of 300M tokens. This was utilized for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for math problems was calculated by comparing with the ground-truth label. The reward for code problems was produced by a reward design trained to predict whether a program would pass the system tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was launched in September and upgraded in December 2024. It was made by combining DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they released a base design DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat design DeepSeek-V3. The design architecture is essentially the same as V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, primarily English and Chinese. It included a higher ratio of math and programming than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length two times, from 4K to 32K and after that to 128K, using YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 epochs on 1.5 M samples of thinking (mathematics, shows, reasoning) and non-reasoning (innovative writing, roleplay, simple concern answering) information. Reasoning data was generated by “expert designs”. Non-reasoning information was created by DeepSeek-V2.5 and examined by people. – The “professional models” were trained by beginning with an unspecified base model, then SFT on both data, and artificial information generated by an internal DeepSeek-R1 model. The system prompt asked the R1 to reflect and verify during thinking. Then the professional designs were RL utilizing an unspecified benefit function.
– Each expert design was trained to generate just synthetic reasoning data in one particular domain (math, shows, reasoning).
– Expert models were utilized, instead of R1 itself, because the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, poor format, and extreme length”.

4. Model-based reward models were made by beginning with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human choice information consisting of both final benefit and chain-of-thought causing the final benefit. The benefit design produced benefit signals for both concerns with objective but free-form answers, and concerns without objective answers (such as creative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both reward designs and rule-based benefit. The rule-based benefit was computed for mathematics issues with a last answer (put in a box), and for programming problems by unit tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek group performed extensive low-level engineering to accomplish performance. They utilized mixed-precision arithmetic. Much of the forward pass was carried out in 8-bit floating point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) instead of the standard 32-bit, requiring special GEMM routines to build up properly. They used a custom 12-bit float (E5M6) for only the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states were in 16-bit (BF16). They decreased the interaction latency by overlapping thoroughly computation and interaction, such as dedicating 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for just inter-GPU interaction. They lowered communication by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the precise machine each professional was on in order to avoid specific machines being queried regularly than the others, including auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing methods. [37]

After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are linked by NVLink, and the clusters are linked by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests reveal that DeepSeek-V3 exceeded Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview ended up being accessible via DeepSeek’s API, in addition to by means of a chat user interface after visiting. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for rational reasoning, mathematical reasoning, and real-time problem-solving. DeepSeek claimed that it exceeded efficiency of OpenAI o1 on standards such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal specified when it used 15 issues from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 model reached an option much faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The business likewise released some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” designs, which are not initialized on V3-Base, but instead are initialized from other pretrained open-weight models, consisting of LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on synthetic data generated by R1. [47]

A discussion in between User and Assistant. The user asks a concern, and the Assistant solves it. The assistant initially thinks of the reasoning process in the mind and after that supplies the user with the response. The thinking process and answer are confined within and tags, respectively, i.e., thinking procedure here address here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained specifically using GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous versions, they used no model-based reward. All reward functions were rule-based, “generally” of two types (other types were not specified): precision rewards and format benefits. Accuracy reward was inspecting whether a boxed answer is appropriate (for math) or whether a code passes tests (for programs). Format benefit was examining whether the model puts its thinking trace within … [47]

As R1-Zero has issues with readability and blending languages, R1 was trained to deal with these problems and additional enhance thinking: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” data all with the basic format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the exact same RL procedure as R1-Zero, but also with a “language consistency reward” to motivate it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal model not released.
3. Synthesize 600K reasoning data from the internal design, with rejection tasting (i.e. if the created thinking had a wrong last response, then it is removed). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, accurate QA, self-cognition, translation) utilizing DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K synthetic information for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for thinking jobs) and model-based benefit (for non-reasoning tasks, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled designs were trained by SFT on 800K data synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a similar way as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and reactions

DeepSeek released its AI Assistant, which utilizes the V3 design as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had gone beyond ChatGPT as the highest-rated totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot apparently responds to concerns, resolves logic issues and composes computer system programs on par with other chatbots on the marketplace, according to benchmark tests used by American AI companies. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 utilizes considerably fewer resources compared to its peers; for instance, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers using as many as 16,000 graphics processing systems (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek claims to require only about 2,000 GPUs, particularly the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at a cost of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is roughly one tenth of what United States tech giant Meta spent building its newest AI innovation. [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive performance at fairly very little cost has been acknowledged as possibly challenging the worldwide supremacy of American AI models. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, explained the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik moment” for American AI. [49] [50] The performance of its R1 model was reportedly “on par with” one of OpenAI’s newest designs when used for jobs such as mathematics, coding, and natural language thinking; [51] echoing other analysts, American Silicon Valley investor Marc Andreessen similarly explained R1 as “AI’s Sputnik moment”. [51]

DeepSeek’s founder, Liang Wenfeng has been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media extensively applauded DeepSeek as a national asset. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang welcomed Liang Wenfeng to his seminar with professionals and asked him to offer viewpoints and suggestions on a draft for remarks of the annual 2024 federal government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of restricted resources has highlighted potential limitations of United States sanctions on China’s AI development, which include export constraints on sophisticated AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the business’s AI models subsequently “triggered market turmoil” [57] and caused shares in major worldwide innovation companies to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of competing Broadcom. Other tech companies also sank, consisting of Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip equipment maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A global selloff of technology stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 model, had caused tape losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and computer system hardware business; [59] by 28 January 2025, an overall of $1 trillion of worth was wiped off American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had blended reactions to DeepSeek’s success and performance. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose business are associated with the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to develop American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “very impressive”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who revealed The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a positive development. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, consisting of Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk revealed uncertainty of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various business, consisting of Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are seeking to utilize the model in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek restricted its brand-new user registration to contact number from mainland China, e-mail addresses, or Google account logins, following a “large-scale” cyberattack interfered with the proper functioning of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have observed that the official application programming interface (API) variation of R1, which runs from servers found in China, utilizes censorship mechanisms for topics that are considered politically delicate for the government of China. For instance, the model declines to address concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, contrasts between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI might at first produce an answer, but then erases it shortly later on and replaces it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my existing scope. Let’s discuss something else.” [72] The integrated censorship mechanisms and limitations can only be removed to a limited extent in the open-source variation of the R1 model. If the “core socialist values” specified by the Chinese Internet regulative authorities are discussed, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are ended. [74] When tested by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 explained Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s territory,” and stated: “We securely oppose any type of ‘Taiwan self-reliance’ separatist activities and are committed to accomplishing the total reunification of the motherland through tranquil means.” [75] In January 2025, Western scientists had the ability to fool DeepSeek into providing particular answers to a few of these topics by requesting in its answer to swap specific letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and privacy

Some specialists fear that the government of China could use the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading out disinformation, surveillance and the advancement of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s privacy conditions state “We store the information we collect in protected servers found in the People’s Republic of China … We may collect your text or audio input, timely, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other material that you provide to our design and Services”. Although the information storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT’s personal privacy policy, [79] a Wired short article reports this as security issues. [80] In action, the Italian information defense authority is seeking additional info on DeepSeek’s collection and use of individual data, and the United States National Security Council announced that it had actually started a national security review. [81] [82] Taiwan’s government prohibited using DeepSeek at government ministries on security premises and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a questions into DeepSeek’s use of personal information. [83]

Expert system industry in China.

Notes

^ a b c The number of heads does not equivalent the variety of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the design called DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was released as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview needed picking “Deep Think allowed”, and every user might utilize it just 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s cheap, open AI model DeepSeek delights researchers”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic exposes an AI world ready to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s less expensive designs and weaker chips bring into question trillions in AI facilities spending”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports may strike India’s AI aspirations”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia investigation signals broadening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dethrones ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you ought to understand”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it causing Nvidia and other stocks to slump?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares tumble as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a leading Chinese AI model conquered US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is changing how AI models are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI leader”. Financial Times. Archived from the initial on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at main · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at primary”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at main”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at main”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s brand-new AI model outperforms Meta, OpenAI items”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, exceeds Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s new AI model seems one of the very best ‘open’ challengers yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: unleashing supercharged reasoning power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the initial on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s first reasoning design R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 efficiency”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, however China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI startup DeepSeek overtakes ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has reached its Sputnik moment”. The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik minute’: $1tn wiped off US stocks after Chinese company reveals AI chatbot” – by means of The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI start-up that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek poses a difficulty to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock thrashing, Graphika states”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 ， 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI business’s AI model breakthrough highlights limits of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot stimulates US market chaos, wiping $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek stimulates global AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of worth”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ but Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella promotes DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “extremely impressive”: “We must take the developments out of China really, very seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek model ‘remarkable'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson bashes China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek development “favorable””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – by means of NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman praises: What leaders say on DeepSeek’s disturbance”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘questions’ DeepSeek’s claims, suggests enormous Nvidia GPU facilities”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS clients, consisting of Stripe and Toyota, are pestering the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI models”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek struck with ‘massive’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app stores”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek temporarily limited brand-new sign-ups, pointing out ‘large-scale harmful attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has triggered a $1 trillion panic – and it doesn’t care about free speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship looks like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We checked out DeepSeek. It worked well, until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a worldwide AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the rise of turmoil”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, providing the AI race its ‘Sputnik minute'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI positions powerful cyber, data privacy risks”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts prompt care over usage of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has actually painted a substantial TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator looks for information from DeepSeek on data defense”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House evaluates impact of China AI app DeepSeek on national security, authorities states”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.